Compotes de pommes vs Coeur de fruits pêche
Overall, Coeur de fruits pêche has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Compotes de pommes | Coeur de fruits pêche |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 52 kcal | 49 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 11 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.1 g | 1.7 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Coeur de fruits pêche has no sugar, while Compotes de pommes has 11 g.
- Compotes de pommes has 19% more fiber (2.1 g vs 1.7 g).
- Coeur de fruits pêche has 44% more protein (0.9 g vs 0.5 g).
Ingredients
Compotes de pommes
Purée de pommes 99%, anti-oxydant : acide ascorbique.
Coeur de fruits pêche
peches, pomme, pectines de fruits, Jus de citrons concentré, arômes naturels, citrates de calcium, acide ascorbique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Compotes de pommes or Coeur de fruits pêche?
Overall, Coeur de fruits pêche has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Coeur de fruits pêche has fewer calories: 49 kcal versus 52 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Coeur de fruits pêche has less sugar: 0 g versus 11 g per 100 g.