Compotes de pommes vs L'onctueux intensément châtaigne
Overall, Compotes de pommes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Compotes de pommes
L'onctueux intensément châtaigne
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Compotes de pommes | L'onctueux intensément châta... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 52 kcal | 135 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 11 g | 26 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.1 g | 1.9 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Compotes de pommes has 61% fewer calories (52 kcal vs 135 kcal).
- Compotes de pommes has 58% less sugar (11 g vs 26 g).
- Compotes de pommes has the better Nutri-Score.
- Compotes de pommes is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only L'onctueux intensément châtaigne lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Compotes de pommes
Purée de pommes 99%, anti-oxydant : acide ascorbique.
L'onctueux intensément châtaigne
Châtaignes 32 %, pommes 32 %, sucre, eau, arôme naturel de vanille, extrait pur de vanille, acidifiant : acide citrique, antioxydant : acide ascorbique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Compotes de pommes or L'onctueux intensément châtaigne?
Overall, Compotes de pommes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Compotes de pommes has fewer calories: 52 kcal versus 135 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Compotes de pommes has less sugar: 11 g versus 26 g per 100 g.