PEANUT filled STICKS vs Chips di patate
Overall, PEANUT filled STICKS has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | PEANUT filled STICKS | Chips di patate |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 484 kcal | 327 kcal |
| Fat | 18 g | 33.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 3.7 g |
| Sugars | 2.8 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 2.6 g | 32.6 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Peanuts, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chips di patate has 32% fewer calories (327 kcal vs 484 kcal).
- PEANUT filled STICKS has 46% less fat (18 g vs 33.4 g).
- PEANUT filled STICKS has 46% less saturated fat (2 g vs 3.7 g).
- Chips di patate has 90% less sugar (0.3 g vs 2.8 g).
- PEANUT filled STICKS has 92% less salt (2.6 g vs 32.6 g).
- PEANUT filled STICKS has 95% more protein (14 g vs 0.7 g).
- Chips di patate is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only PEANUT filled STICKS lists: Gluten, Peanuts, Soybeans.
Ingredients
PEANUT filled STICKS
STICKS SALATI RIPIENI DI ARACHIDI. Ingredienti: farina di frumento arcitura 24% (arachidi), amido, olio di girasole, sale 2,5%, zucchero, emulsionante lecitina di soia, agente lievitante: carbonati di ammonio, malto d' orzo, lievito, ricoperto con correttore di acidità: idrossido di sodio.
Chips di patate
Patate, olio di semi di girasole, sale. SENZA GLUTINE.
FAQ
Which is healthier: PEANUT filled STICKS or Chips di patate?
Overall, PEANUT filled STICKS has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chips di patate has fewer calories: 327 kcal versus 484 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chips di patate has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 2.8 g per 100 g.