Chips di patate vs Cracker salati
Overall, Cracker salati has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chips di patate | Cracker salati |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 327 kcal | 435 kcal |
| Fat | 33.4 g | 3.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.7 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 2.3 g |
| Salt | 32.6 g | 1.9 g |
| Fiber | 0.6 g | 2.8 g |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 9.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chips di patate has 25% fewer calories (327 kcal vs 435 kcal).
- Cracker salati has 90% less fat (3.3 g vs 33.4 g).
- Cracker salati has 92% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 3.7 g).
- Chips di patate has 87% less sugar (0.3 g vs 2.3 g).
- Cracker salati has 94% less salt (1.9 g vs 32.6 g).
- Cracker salati has 79% more fiber (2.8 g vs 0.6 g).
- Cracker salati has 93% more protein (9.8 g vs 0.7 g).
- Cracker salati has the better Nutri-Score.
- Chips di patate is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Cracker salati lists: Gluten, Mustard.
Ingredients
Chips di patate
Patate, olio di semi di girasole, sale. SENZA GLUTINE.
Cracker salati
Farina di grano tenera, oli vegetali (girasole, sola, palmal sale 13% correttore di acidità: carbonato acido di sodio, lievito madre frumento e oreo forina di orzo maltato, lievito di birra, aroma naturale di oliva. Può contenere sesamo, sola e senape
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chips di patate or Cracker salati?
Overall, Cracker salati has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chips di patate has fewer calories: 327 kcal versus 435 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chips di patate has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.