Comparison

Pates Spaghetti n°9 Garofalo 500GV2 vs Gnocchi di Patate

Overall, Pates Spaghetti n°9 Garofalo 500GV2 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPates Spaghetti n°9 Garofalo...Gnocchi di Patate
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 357 kcal 159 kcal
Fat 1 g 0.4 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.1 g
Sugars 3 g 0.1 g
Salt 0.1 g 1.4 g
Fiber 3 g 1.6 g
Protein 14 g 5 g
Additives02
AllergensGlutenGluten, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Gnocchi di Patate has 55% fewer calories (159 kcal vs 357 kcal).
  • Gnocchi di Patate has 60% less fat (0.4 g vs 1 g).
  • Gnocchi di Patate has 97% less sugar (0.1 g vs 3 g).
  • Pates Spaghetti n°9 Garofalo 500GV2 has 93% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Pates Spaghetti n°9 Garofalo 500GV2 has 47% more fiber (3 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Pates Spaghetti n°9 Garofalo 500GV2 has 64% more protein (14 g vs 5 g).
  • Pates Spaghetti n°9 Garofalo 500GV2 has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Pates Spaghetti n°9 Garofalo 500GV2 is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Gnocchi di Patate lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Pates Spaghetti n°9 Garofalo 500GV2

100% Semoule de BLE dur de qualité supérieure. Peut contenir du soja

Gnocchi di Patate

Pomme de terre fraîches 80%,semoule de blé dur 10%, amidon de pomme de terre 6,5%, farine de riz 1,5%, sel, acide lactique, acide sorbique, arôme naturel, curcuma.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pates Spaghetti n°9 Garofalo 500GV2 or Gnocchi di Patate?

Overall, Pates Spaghetti n°9 Garofalo 500GV2 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Gnocchi di Patate has fewer calories: 159 kcal versus 357 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Gnocchi di Patate has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons