Pate de pui integral vs Ovnsbakt kyllingpostei
Overall, Ovnsbakt kyllingpostei has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pate de pui integral | Ovnsbakt kyllingpostei |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 208 kcal | 153 kcal |
| Fat | 16.9 g | 8.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.7 g | 2.4 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 1.1 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 1 g | — |
| Protein | 9.3 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ovnsbakt kyllingpostei has 26% fewer calories (153 kcal vs 208 kcal).
- Ovnsbakt kyllingpostei has 49% less fat (8.6 g vs 16.9 g).
- Ovnsbakt kyllingpostei has 11% less saturated fat (2.4 g vs 2.7 g).
- Ovnsbakt kyllingpostei has 45% less sugar (1.1 g vs 2 g).
- Ovnsbakt kyllingpostei has 22% more protein (12 g vs 9.3 g).
Ingredients
Pate de pui integral
PATE DE PUI INTEGRAL PRODUS STERILIZAT. INGREDIENTE: FICAT DE PUI (20%), CARNE DE PUI, ULEI DE FLOAREA-SOARELUI, PROTEINA VEGETALA DIN SOLA, APA, SARE IODATA, ZAHAR AMIDON DIN PORUMB, SMANTANA PRAF, LAPTE PRAF, CEAPA, CONDIMENTE, USTUROI ASE PASTRA IN LOC USCAT ȘI RACOROS, LA TEMPERATURA DE +4°C PANA LA MAXIM +25C DUPA DESCHIDEREA CUTIEI, A SE PASTRA LA FRIGIDER ÎN VEDEREA CONSUMULUI MAXIM 24 ONE A SE CONSUMA, DE PREFERINŢĂ, ÎNAINTE DE: VEZI PARTEA INFERIOARA A AMBALAJUL DECLARATIE NUTRITIONALĂ PENTRU 100g DE PRODUS: VALOARE ENERGETICA 63 KJ/
Ovnsbakt kyllingpostei
Kyllinglever (35 %), vann, maskinelt utbeinet kyllingkjøtt (16%), kalkun og kyllingkjøtt (13 %), kyllingskinn, potetstivelse, salt, dekstrose, løk, løkekstrakt, krydder (inkl. hvitløk, paprika), konserveringsmiddel E250, konsistensmiddel E410, E412, E415, E460, modifisert stivelse (mais) E1422, antioksidant E315.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pate de pui integral or Ovnsbakt kyllingpostei?
Overall, Ovnsbakt kyllingpostei has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ovnsbakt kyllingpostei has fewer calories: 153 kcal versus 208 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ovnsbakt kyllingpostei has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 2 g per 100 g.