Comparison
Pâte de pistache vs Pistazienmus
Overall, Pistazienmus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pâte de pistache | Pistazienmus |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 511 kcal | 557 kcal |
| Fat | 25.8 g | 44 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.1 g | 5 g |
| Sugars | 51 g | 7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 5.1 g | 10 g |
| Protein | 11.3 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pâte de pistache has 41% less fat (25.8 g vs 44 g).
- Pâte de pistache has 38% less saturated fat (3.1 g vs 5 g).
- Pistazienmus has 86% less sugar (7 g vs 51 g).
- Pistazienmus has 50% more fiber (10 g vs 5.1 g).
- Pistazienmus has 46% more protein (21 g vs 11.3 g).
- Pistazienmus has the better Nutri-Score.
- Pistazienmus is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Pâte de pistache
Pistache (50%), sucre. Traces éventuelles d'autres fruits à coque.
Pistazienmus
100 % Pistazien
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pâte de pistache or Pistazienmus?
Overall, Pistazienmus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pâte de pistache has fewer calories: 511 kcal versus 557 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pistazienmus has less sugar: 7 g versus 51 g per 100 g.