Comparison

Pate de lapin vs Pate de lapin

Overall, Pate de lapin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPate de lapinPate de lapin
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group — —
Calories 377 kcal 292 kcal
Fat 34 g 24 g
Saturated fat 14 g 8.6 g
Sugars 0.6 g 0.5 g
Salt 1 g 1.5 g
Protein 15 g 18 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pate de lapin has 23% fewer calories (292 kcal vs 377 kcal).
  • Pate de lapin has 29% less fat (24 g vs 34 g).
  • Pate de lapin has 39% less saturated fat (8.6 g vs 14 g).
  • Pate de lapin has 33% less salt (1 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Pate de lapin has 17% more protein (18 g vs 15 g).

Ingredients

Pate de lapin

Not available.

Pate de lapin

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pate de lapin or Pate de lapin?

Overall, Pate de lapin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pate de lapin has fewer calories: 292 kcal versus 377 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pate de lapin has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons