Pate de lapin vs Pate de lapin
Overall, Pate de lapin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pate de lapin | Pate de lapin |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 377 kcal | 292 kcal |
| Fat | 34 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 14 g | 8.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pate de lapin has 23% fewer calories (292 kcal vs 377 kcal).
- Pate de lapin has 29% less fat (24 g vs 34 g).
- Pate de lapin has 39% less saturated fat (8.6 g vs 14 g).
- Pate de lapin has 33% less salt (1 g vs 1.5 g).
- Pate de lapin has 17% more protein (18 g vs 15 g).
Ingredients
Pate de lapin
Not available.
Pate de lapin
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pate de lapin or Pate de lapin?
Overall, Pate de lapin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pate de lapin has fewer calories: 292 kcal versus 377 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pate de lapin has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.