Comparison

PATE BRISEE BIO MGV 230g vs Pâte Brisée

Overall, Pâte Brisée has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPATE BRISEE BIO MGV 230gPâte Brisée
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 388 kcal 393 kcal
Fat 20.6 g 22 g
Saturated fat 10.1 g 11 g
Sugars 2.2 g 1.3 g
Salt 1.2 g 0.8 g
Fiber 1.5 g 1.4 g
Protein 6.7 g 5.7 g
Additives03
AllergensGlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pâte Brisée has 41% less sugar (1.3 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Pâte Brisée has 31% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.2 g).
  • PATE BRISEE BIO MGV 230g has 15% more protein (6.7 g vs 5.7 g).
  • Pâte Brisée has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

PATE BRISEE BIO MGV 230g

Farine de blé** 55,5%, margarine végétale** (huile de palme**, eau, huile de tournesol**, sel, jus de citron concentré**), eau, sucre de canne**, alcool**, sel, vinaigre de cidre**, gluten de blé**, levure désactivée. Traces possibles de lait. **Ingrédients d'origine agricole obtenus selon le mode de production biologique. *La farine de blé n'est pas française. INFORMATIONS & à concommerical / N° de lot • voir sur l'emballage Àc do - conserver

Pâte Brisée

wheat flour, vegetable margarine 26% (vegetable fats (palm, coprah, palmist), vegetable oils (colza, sunflower), water, salt, emulsifier: e471, acidifier: citric acid, dye: carotenoids), water, alcohol, sugar, salt, alcohol vinegar, deactivated yeast, traces of milk

FAQ

Which is healthier: PATE BRISEE BIO MGV 230g or Pâte Brisée?

Overall, Pâte Brisée has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

PATE BRISEE BIO MGV 230g has fewer calories: 388 kcal versus 393 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pâte Brisée has less sugar: 1.3 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons