Patatas FranJose vs Apetinas
Overall, Apetinas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Patatas FranJose | Apetinas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 551 kcal | 444 kcal |
| Fat | 35.7 g | 15.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.4 g | 1.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 4 g |
| Salt | 2.2 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 7.7 g | 1.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Apetinas has 19% fewer calories (444 kcal vs 551 kcal).
- Apetinas has 56% less fat (15.6 g vs 35.7 g).
- Apetinas has 69% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 5.4 g).
- Patatas FranJose has 95% less sugar (0.2 g vs 4 g).
- Apetinas has no salt, while Patatas FranJose has 2.2 g.
- Patatas FranJose has 77% more protein (7.7 g vs 1.8 g).
- Apetinas has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Patatas FranJose
Not available.
Apetinas
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Patatas FranJose or Apetinas?
Overall, Apetinas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Apetinas has fewer calories: 444 kcal versus 551 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Patatas FranJose has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 4 g per 100 g.