Chips Feta & Olive Tapenade vs Patatas FranJose
Overall, Chips Feta & Olive Tapenade has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chips Feta & Olive Tapenade | Patatas FranJose |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 522 kcal | 551 kcal |
| Fat | 29.8 g | 35.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.2 g | 5.4 g |
| Sugars | 3.7 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 2.2 g |
| Protein | 5.9 g | 7.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chips Feta & Olive Tapenade has 17% less fat (29.8 g vs 35.7 g).
- Chips Feta & Olive Tapenade has 41% less saturated fat (3.2 g vs 5.4 g).
- Patatas FranJose has 95% less sugar (0.2 g vs 3.7 g).
- Chips Feta & Olive Tapenade has 50% less salt (1.1 g vs 2.2 g).
- Patatas FranJose has 23% more protein (7.7 g vs 5.9 g).
- Chips Feta & Olive Tapenade has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Chips Feta & Olive Tapenade
Not available.
Patatas FranJose
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chips Feta & Olive Tapenade or Patatas FranJose?
Overall, Chips Feta & Olive Tapenade has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chips Feta & Olive Tapenade has fewer calories: 522 kcal versus 551 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Patatas FranJose has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 3.7 g per 100 g.