Comparison
Pasta di gragnano vs Fusilli
Overall, Pasta di gragnano has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pasta di gragnano | Fusilli |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 351 kcal | 351 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 1.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 3.1 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.4 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 14.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pasta di gragnano has 13% more fiber (3.4 g vs 3 g).
Ingredients
Pasta di gragnano
SEMOLA DI GRANO DURO.
Fusilli
Semoule de BLE dur. Peut contenir du SOJA et de la MOUTARDE.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pasta di gragnano or Fusilli?
Overall, Pasta di gragnano has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pasta di gragnano has fewer calories: 351 kcal versus 351 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pasta di gragnano has less sugar: 3 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.