Comparison
Part flan coco vs Bande flan coco
Overall, Bande flan coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Part flan coco | Bande flan coco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 190 kcal | 202 kcal |
| Fat | 8.3 g | 8.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.7 g | 5 g |
| Sugars | 17 g | 16 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.4 g |
| Protein | 3.4 g | 3.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bande flan coco has 12% less saturated fat (5 g vs 5.7 g).
- Bande flan coco has 11% more protein (3.8 g vs 3.4 g).
Ingredients
Part flan coco
Not available.
Bande flan coco
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Part flan coco or Bande flan coco?
Overall, Bande flan coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Part flan coco has fewer calories: 190 kcal versus 202 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bande flan coco has less sugar: 16 g versus 17 g per 100 g.