Paprika / 0 Spitzpaprika vs Delikatess Hinterschinken
Overall, Paprika / 0 Spitzpaprika has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Paprika / 0 Spitzpaprika | Delikatess Hinterschinken |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 144 kcal | 109 kcal |
| Fat | 6 g | 3 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 22 g | 19.8 g |
| Additives | 2 | 3 |
| Allergens | Celery | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Delikatess Hinterschinken has 24% fewer calories (109 kcal vs 144 kcal).
- Delikatess Hinterschinken has 50% less fat (3 g vs 6 g).
- Paprika / 0 Spitzpaprika has 41% less salt (1 g vs 1.7 g).
- Paprika / 0 Spitzpaprika has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Paprika / 0 Spitzpaprika lists: Celery.
Ingredients
Paprika / 0 Spitzpaprika
Putenfleisch 85%, Kochbrühe (Putenfleisch,Wasser), Speisegelatine (Rind), jodiertes Speisesalz ( Speisesalz, Kaliumjodat), Dextrose, Gewürzte (U.a.Sellerie), Gewürzextrakt, Antioxidantien: Natriumascorbat, Konservierungsstoff:Natiumnitrit.
Delikatess Hinterschinken
Schweinefleisch, jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumiodat), Dextrose, Festigungsmittel: Kaliumchlorid; Stabilisator: Diphosphate; Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat; Gewürze, Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Paprika / 0 Spitzpaprika or Delikatess Hinterschinken?
Overall, Paprika / 0 Spitzpaprika has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Delikatess Hinterschinken has fewer calories: 109 kcal versus 144 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Delikatess Hinterschinken has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.