Őszibarack befőtt vs Melocotón en Almíbar
Overall, Őszibarack befőtt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Őszibarack befőtt | Melocotón en Almíbar |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 60 kcal | 76 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 12.3 g | 16.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Fiber | 1.5 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Őszibarack befőtt has 21% fewer calories (60 kcal vs 76 kcal).
- Őszibarack befőtt has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Őszibarack befőtt has 26% less sugar (12.3 g vs 16.6 g).
- Őszibarack befőtt has 33% more fiber (1.5 g vs 1 g).
Ingredients
Őszibarack befőtt
Pfirsiche, Wasser, Zucker, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure
Melocotón en Almíbar
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Őszibarack befőtt or Melocotón en Almíbar?
Overall, Őszibarack befőtt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Őszibarack befőtt has fewer calories: 60 kcal versus 76 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Őszibarack befőtt has less sugar: 12.3 g versus 16.6 g per 100 g.