Comparison
Organic Red Sweet Potatoes vs Microwaveable Asparagus
Overall, Microwaveable Asparagus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Organic Red Sweet Potatoes
Tesco · 1 lb
Better choice 
Microwaveable Asparagus
Trader Joe's · 1 cup, chopped
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Organic Red Sweet Potatoes | Microwaveable Asparagus |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 551 kcal | 40 kcal |
| Fat | 32.4 g | 2.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 19.4 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 52.5 g | 1.8 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 7.4 g | 2.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Microwaveable Asparagus has 93% fewer calories (40 kcal vs 551 kcal).
- Microwaveable Asparagus has 93% less fat (2.2 g vs 32.4 g).
- Microwaveable Asparagus has no saturated fat, while Organic Red Sweet Potatoes has 19.4 g.
- Microwaveable Asparagus has 97% less sugar (1.8 g vs 52.5 g).
- Microwaveable Asparagus has 39% more fiber (1.8 g vs 1.1 g).
- Organic Red Sweet Potatoes has 64% more protein (7.4 g vs 2.7 g).
- Microwaveable Asparagus has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Organic Red Sweet Potatoes
Not available.
Microwaveable Asparagus
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Organic Red Sweet Potatoes or Microwaveable Asparagus?
Overall, Microwaveable Asparagus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Microwaveable Asparagus has fewer calories: 40 kcal versus 551 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Microwaveable Asparagus has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 52.5 g per 100 g.