Optimum pesca italiana vs Melocotón y uva
Overall, Melocotón y uva has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Optimum pesca italiana | Melocotón y uva |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 56 kcal | 55 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 12.5 g | 10.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Melocotón y uva has 13% less sugar (10.9 g vs 12.5 g).
- Melocotón y uva has the better Nutri-Score.
- Melocotón y uva is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Optimum pesca italiana
purea di pesca, acqua, zucchero, sciroppo di glucosio-fruttosio, acidificante: acido citrico, aromi, vitamina C.
Melocotón y uva
Puré de melocotón 57,5%, zumo de uva a partir de concentrado 42,5%, antioxidante (ácido ascórbico).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Optimum pesca italiana or Melocotón y uva?
Overall, Melocotón y uva has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Melocotón y uva has fewer calories: 55 kcal versus 56 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Melocotón y uva has less sugar: 10.9 g versus 12.5 g per 100 g.