Omega 3 EPA + DHA 60% vs Möllers
Overall, Möllers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Omega 3 EPA + DHA 60% | Möllers |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 2 |
| Calories | 728 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 72 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.8 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 14.5 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Möllers has no calories, while Omega 3 EPA + DHA 60% has 728 kcal.
- Möllers has no fat, while Omega 3 EPA + DHA 60% has 72 g.
- Möllers has no saturated fat, while Omega 3 EPA + DHA 60% has 1.8 g.
- Möllers has no sugar, while Omega 3 EPA + DHA 60% has 1 g.
- Omega 3 EPA + DHA 60% has 100% more protein (14.5 g vs 0 g).
- Möllers is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Omega 3 EPA + DHA 60% lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Omega 3 EPA + DHA 60%
_Fisch_öl (aus Peruanischen Sardellen), Kapselhülle (Rinder-Gelatine, Glycerin, Wasser), gemischte natürliche Tocopherole
Möllers
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Omega 3 EPA + DHA 60% or Möllers?
Overall, Möllers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Möllers has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 728 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Möllers has less sugar: 0 g versus 1 g per 100 g.