Comparison

Omega 3 EPA + DHA 60% vs Möllers

Overall, Möllers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientOmega 3 EPA + DHA 60%Möllers
Nutri-Score — b
NOVA group 4 2
Calories 728 kcal 0 kcal
Fat 72 g 0 g
Saturated fat 1.8 g 0 g
Sugars 1 g 0 g
Salt 0.1 g 0 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 14.5 g 0 g
Additives10
AllergensFishNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Möllers has no calories, while Omega 3 EPA + DHA 60% has 728 kcal.
  • Möllers has no fat, while Omega 3 EPA + DHA 60% has 72 g.
  • Möllers has no saturated fat, while Omega 3 EPA + DHA 60% has 1.8 g.
  • Möllers has no sugar, while Omega 3 EPA + DHA 60% has 1 g.
  • Omega 3 EPA + DHA 60% has 100% more protein (14.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Möllers is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Omega 3 EPA + DHA 60% lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Omega 3 EPA + DHA 60%

_Fisch_öl (aus Peruanischen Sardellen), Kapselhülle (Rinder-Gelatine, Glycerin, Wasser), gemischte natürliche Tocopherole

Möllers

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Omega 3 EPA + DHA 60% or Möllers?

Overall, Möllers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Möllers has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 728 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Möllers has less sugar: 0 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons