Olympus vs Fusetea
Overall, Olympus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Olympus | Fusetea |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 18 kcal | 19 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 4.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Olympus has no sugar, while Fusetea has 4.6 g.
- Olympus has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Olympus
Apă, frunze de ștevie, ceai de Sideritis Scardica, suc concentrat de struguri (3,1%), suc concentrat de mere (2,9%), suc concentrat de lămâie (0,7%), aromă naturală de lămâie.
Fusetea
Apá, zahăr, fructoza, acidifiant acid cit Bautura racoritoare necarbogazoasă cu extract de ceai negru si suc de mango si ana Sac de mango din concentrat (0,1%), suc de ananas din concentrat (0,1%), extract de ceai ne 10%), arome naturale, corector de aciditate citrati de sodiu, antioxidant acid ascorbic
FAQ
Which is healthier: Olympus or Fusetea?
Overall, Olympus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Olympus has fewer calories: 18 kcal versus 19 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Olympus has less sugar: 0 g versus 4.6 g per 100 g.