Olympus Ceai vs Fusetea
Overall, Olympus Ceai has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Olympus Ceai | Fusetea |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 1 kcal | 19 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 4.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Olympus Ceai has 95% fewer calories (1 kcal vs 19 kcal).
- Olympus Ceai has no sugar, while Fusetea has 4.6 g.
- Olympus Ceai has the better Nutri-Score.
- Olympus Ceai is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Olympus Ceai
Apă, mentă (2%), (Mentha piperita), frunze de ștevie, ceai de Sideritis Scardica, suc concentrat de struguri (3,1%), suc concentrat de mere (2,9%).
Fusetea
Apá, zahăr, fructoza, acidifiant acid cit Bautura racoritoare necarbogazoasă cu extract de ceai negru si suc de mango si ana Sac de mango din concentrat (0,1%), suc de ananas din concentrat (0,1%), extract de ceai ne 10%), arome naturale, corector de aciditate citrati de sodiu, antioxidant acid ascorbic
FAQ
Which is healthier: Olympus Ceai or Fusetea?
Overall, Olympus Ceai has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Olympus Ceai has fewer calories: 1 kcal versus 19 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Olympus Ceai has less sugar: 0 g versus 4.6 g per 100 g.