Olympus vs Ceai de la munte rodie
Overall, Olympus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Olympus | Ceai de la munte rodie |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 18 kcal | 16 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 3.9 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Olympus has no sugar, while Ceai de la munte rodie has 3.9 g.
- Olympus has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Olympus
Apă, frunze de ștevie, ceai de Sideritis Scardica, suc concentrat de struguri (3,1%), suc concentrat de mere (2,9%), suc concentrat de lămâie (0,7%), aromă naturală de lămâie.
Ceai de la munte rodie
Apă, frunze de ștevie, ceai de Sideritis Scardica, suc concentrat de struguri (3,1%), suc concentrat de mere (2,9%), suc concentrat de rodie (0,6%), aromă naturală de rodie.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Olympus or Ceai de la munte rodie?
Overall, Olympus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ceai de la munte rodie has fewer calories: 16 kcal versus 18 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Olympus has less sugar: 0 g versus 3.9 g per 100 g.