Olives vertes cassées pimentées de Tata Paulette vs Aceitunas verdes partidas chupadedos
Overall, Aceitunas verdes partidas chupadedos has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Olives vertes cassées pimentées de Tata Paulette
Aceitunas verdes partidas chupadedos
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Olives vertes cassées piment... | Aceitunas verdes partidas ch... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 203 kcal | 128 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 10.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 1.9 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 4 g | 2.4 g |
| Fiber | 3 g | — |
| Protein | 2 g | 1.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Aceitunas verdes partidas chupadedos has 37% fewer calories (128 kcal vs 203 kcal).
- Aceitunas verdes partidas chupadedos has 47% less fat (10.7 g vs 20 g).
- Aceitunas verdes partidas chupadedos has 80% less sugar (0.2 g vs 1 g).
- Aceitunas verdes partidas chupadedos has 40% less salt (2.4 g vs 4 g).
- Aceitunas verdes partidas chupadedos has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Olives vertes cassées pimentées de Tata Paulette
Not available.
Aceitunas verdes partidas chupadedos
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Olives vertes cassées pimentées de Tata Paulette or Aceitunas verdes partidas chupadedos?
Overall, Aceitunas verdes partidas chupadedos has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Aceitunas verdes partidas chupadedos has fewer calories: 128 kcal versus 203 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Aceitunas verdes partidas chupadedos has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 1 g per 100 g.