Comparison

Olives vertes cassées pimentées de Tata Paulette vs Aceitunas verdes partidas chupadedos

Overall, Aceitunas verdes partidas chupadedos has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientOlives vertes cassées piment...Aceitunas verdes partidas ch...
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group — —
Calories 203 kcal 128 kcal
Fat 20 g 10.7 g
Saturated fat 2 g 1.9 g
Sugars 1 g 0.2 g
Salt 4 g 2.4 g
Fiber 3 g —
Protein 2 g 1.8 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Aceitunas verdes partidas chupadedos has 37% fewer calories (128 kcal vs 203 kcal).
  • Aceitunas verdes partidas chupadedos has 47% less fat (10.7 g vs 20 g).
  • Aceitunas verdes partidas chupadedos has 80% less sugar (0.2 g vs 1 g).
  • Aceitunas verdes partidas chupadedos has 40% less salt (2.4 g vs 4 g).
  • Aceitunas verdes partidas chupadedos has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Olives vertes cassées pimentées de Tata Paulette

Not available.

Aceitunas verdes partidas chupadedos

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Olives vertes cassées pimentées de Tata Paulette or Aceitunas verdes partidas chupadedos?

Overall, Aceitunas verdes partidas chupadedos has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Aceitunas verdes partidas chupadedos has fewer calories: 128 kcal versus 203 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Aceitunas verdes partidas chupadedos has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons