Comparison

Oeufs de lompe noirs vs Oeufs de lompe noirs 100g

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientOeufs de lompe noirsOeufs de lompe noirs 100g
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 85 kcal 66 kcal
Fat 4.5 g 3.1 g
Saturated fat 1 g 0.7 g
Sugars 0.2 g 0.5 g
Salt 4.5 g 5 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 10 g 8.7 g
Additives65
AllergensNone listedFish, Gluten, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Oeufs de lompe noirs 100g has 22% fewer calories (66 kcal vs 85 kcal).
  • Oeufs de lompe noirs 100g has 31% less fat (3.1 g vs 4.5 g).
  • Oeufs de lompe noirs 100g has 30% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 1 g).
  • Oeufs de lompe noirs has 60% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Oeufs de lompe noirs has 10% less salt (4.5 g vs 5 g).
  • Oeufs de lompe noirs has 13% more protein (10 g vs 8.7 g).
  • Only Oeufs de lompe noirs 100g lists: Fish, Gluten, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Oeufs de lompe noirs

OEUFS DE LOMPE (85%), eau, sel, colorants: E150d, E151, conservateurs: E211, E202, sucre, épaississant: E415, correcteur d'acidité: E330, épices

Oeufs de lompe noirs 100g

Oeufs de lompe (POISSON) 82%, eau, sel, épaississant : gomme xanthane, acidifiant : acide citrique conservateur : benzoate de sodium colorants : noir brillant PN, caramel E150d Traces éventuelles de soja et céréales contenant du gluten (blé) Produit importé d'Islande.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Oeufs de lompe noirs or Oeufs de lompe noirs 100g?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Oeufs de lompe noirs 100g has fewer calories: 66 kcal versus 85 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Oeufs de lompe noirs has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons