Obazda Rostzwiebel vs Emmentaler 45 % Fett i. Tr.
Overall, Emmentaler 45 % Fett i. Tr. has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Obazda Rostzwiebel | Emmentaler 45 % Fett i. Tr. |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 303 kcal | 395 kcal |
| Fat | 27 g | 31 g |
| Saturated fat | 18 g | 22 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 29 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Obazda Rostzwiebel has 23% fewer calories (303 kcal vs 395 kcal).
- Obazda Rostzwiebel has 13% less fat (27 g vs 31 g).
- Obazda Rostzwiebel has 18% less saturated fat (18 g vs 22 g).
- Emmentaler 45 % Fett i. Tr. has no sugar, while Obazda Rostzwiebel has 1.2 g.
- Emmentaler 45 % Fett i. Tr. has 61% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.8 g).
- Emmentaler 45 % Fett i. Tr. has 59% more protein (29 g vs 12 g).
- Emmentaler 45 % Fett i. Tr. has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Obazda Rostzwiebel
53% _Camembert_, _Rahm_, _Butter_, Röstzwiebeln, _Frischkäse_, Salz, Paprika, Gewürze.
Emmentaler 45 % Fett i. Tr.
Bio Heumilch, mikrobielles Lab
FAQ
Which is healthier: Obazda Rostzwiebel or Emmentaler 45 % Fett i. Tr.?
Overall, Emmentaler 45 % Fett i. Tr. has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Obazda Rostzwiebel has fewer calories: 303 kcal versus 395 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Emmentaler 45 % Fett i. Tr. has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.