Comparison

Oasis Pomme-Cassis-Framboise vs Double concentré de tomates

Overall, Double concentré de tomates has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientOasis Pomme-Cassis-FramboiseDouble concentré de tomates
Nutri-Score d a
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 31 kcal 123 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.4 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.1 g
Sugars 7.4 g 9 g
Salt 0 g 0.5 g
Fiber 0 g 3 g
Protein 0 g 4.6 g
Additives30
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Oasis Pomme-Cassis-Framboise has 75% fewer calories (31 kcal vs 123 kcal).
  • Oasis Pomme-Cassis-Framboise has no fat, while Double concentré de tomates has 0.4 g.
  • Oasis Pomme-Cassis-Framboise has 18% less sugar (7.4 g vs 9 g).
  • Oasis Pomme-Cassis-Framboise has no salt, while Double concentré de tomates has 0.5 g.
  • Double concentré de tomates has 100% more fiber (3 g vs 0 g).
  • Double concentré de tomates has 100% more protein (4.6 g vs 0 g).
  • Double concentré de tomates has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Double concentré de tomates is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Oasis Pomme-Cassis-Framboise

eau de source 80%, jus de fruits à base de concentrés 12% (pomme 8,5%, cassis 2%, sureau, framboise 0,2%), sucre, acidifiant : acide citrique et acide malique, arômes naturels, antioxydant : acide ascorbique.

Double concentré de tomates

Tomates, Sel.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Oasis Pomme-Cassis-Framboise or Double concentré de tomates?

Overall, Double concentré de tomates has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Oasis Pomme-Cassis-Framboise has fewer calories: 31 kcal versus 123 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Oasis Pomme-Cassis-Framboise has less sugar: 7.4 g versus 9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons