Beyond Burger vs Double concentré de tomates
Overall, Double concentré de tomates has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Beyond Burger | Double concentré de tomates |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 196 kcal | 123 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.9 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 9 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 4.6 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Double concentré de tomates has 37% fewer calories (123 kcal vs 196 kcal).
- Double concentré de tomates has 97% less fat (0.4 g vs 12 g).
- Double concentré de tomates has 97% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 2.9 g).
- Beyond Burger has 93% less sugar (0.6 g vs 9 g).
- Double concentré de tomates has 60% more fiber (3 g vs 1.2 g).
- Beyond Burger has 71% more protein (16 g vs 4.6 g).
- Double concentré de tomates has the better Nutri-Score.
- Double concentré de tomates is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Beyond Burger
Trinkwasser, Ersbenprotein 15 %, Rapsöl, Kokosnussöl, Reisprotein, Aroma, Stabilisator (Methylcellulose), Kartoffelstärke, Apfelextrakt, Farbstoff (Betenrot), Maltodextrin, Granatapfelextrakt, Salz, Kaliumchlorid, Zitronsaftkonzentrat, Karottenpulver, Emulgator (lecithin).
Double concentré de tomates
Tomates, Sel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Beyond Burger or Double concentré de tomates?
Overall, Double concentré de tomates has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Double concentré de tomates has fewer calories: 123 kcal versus 196 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Beyond Burger has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 9 g per 100 g.