Nouilles en nids sachet de 250g vs Nouilles recette asiatique aux oeufs
Overall, Nouilles en nids sachet de 250g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nouilles en nids sachet de 250g
Nouilles recette asiatique aux oeufs
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Nouilles en nids sachet de 2... | Nouilles recette asiatique a... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 355 kcal | 363 kcal |
| Fat | 3 g | 3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 3 g | 2.5 g |
| Protein | 13.5 g | 12.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten | Eggs, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nouilles en nids sachet de 250g has 14% less sugar (3 g vs 3.5 g).
- Nouilles en nids sachet de 250g has 94% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.9 g).
- Nouilles en nids sachet de 250g has 17% more fiber (3 g vs 2.5 g).
- Nouilles en nids sachet de 250g has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Nouilles en nids sachet de 250g
Semoule de BLE dur de qualité supérieure, OEUFS frais 13.8% soit 140 g par kilo de semoule. Les ingrédients de ce produit ne proviennent pas d'Asie. Traces éventuelles de soja.
Nouilles recette asiatique aux oeufs
Farine de BLÉ tendre (58%) - farine de BLÉ dur - OEUFS (15%) - sel - correcteur d'acidité : carbonate de potassium. Traces de SOJA, LAIT et SÉSAME.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Nouilles en nids sachet de 250g or Nouilles recette asiatique aux oeufs?
Overall, Nouilles en nids sachet de 250g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nouilles en nids sachet de 250g has fewer calories: 355 kcal versus 363 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nouilles en nids sachet de 250g has less sugar: 3 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.