Comparison
Naturradler vs Bavaria 0 Alcol
Overall, Bavaria 0 Alcol has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Naturradler | Bavaria 0 Alcol |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 41 kcal | 19 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 4.7 g | 2.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bavaria 0 Alcol has 54% fewer calories (19 kcal vs 41 kcal).
- Bavaria 0 Alcol has no fat, while Naturradler has 0.5 g.
- Bavaria 0 Alcol has 50% less sugar (2.4 g vs 4.7 g).
Ingredients
Naturradler
Not available.
Bavaria 0 Alcol
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Naturradler or Bavaria 0 Alcol?
Overall, Bavaria 0 Alcol has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bavaria 0 Alcol has fewer calories: 19 kcal versus 41 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bavaria 0 Alcol has less sugar: 2.4 g versus 4.7 g per 100 g.