Naturradler vs Radler Zitrone
Overall, Naturradler has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Naturradler | Radler Zitrone |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 41 kcal | 39 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 4.7 g | 5.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Naturradler has 11% less sugar (4.7 g vs 5.3 g).
- Only Radler Zitrone lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Naturradler
Not available.
Radler Zitrone
Limonade 60% (Wasser, Fruktosesirup, Zitronensaft aus Konzentrat 2.7%, Orangensaft aus Konzentrat, Limettensaft aus Konzentrat, Acerolasaft aus Konzentrat, Kohlensäure, konzentrierter Zitronenextrakt, natürliches Zitronenaroma mit anderen natürlichen Aromen, Stabilisator: Johannisbrotkernmehl, Zitronengrasextrakt), Bier 40% (Wasser, _Gerstenmalz_, Hopfenextrakt)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Naturradler or Radler Zitrone?
Overall, Naturradler has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Radler Zitrone has fewer calories: 39 kcal versus 41 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Naturradler has less sugar: 4.7 g versus 5.3 g per 100 g.