Hard Soda vs Naturradler
Overall, Hard Soda has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hard Soda | Naturradler |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 28 kcal | 41 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 4.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Additives | 6 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hard Soda has 31% fewer calories (28 kcal vs 41 kcal).
- Hard Soda has no fat, while Naturradler has 0.5 g.
- Hard Soda has no sugar, while Naturradler has 4.7 g.
- Naturradler has 100% more protein (0.3 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Hard Soda
WATER, ALCOHOL, NATURAL FLAVORS, CARAMEL COLOR, PHOSPHORIC ACID, SODIUM CITRATE, SUCRALOSE, TARTARIC ACID, ACESULFAME K, MALTED RICE
Naturradler
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hard Soda or Naturradler?
Overall, Hard Soda has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hard Soda has fewer calories: 28 kcal versus 41 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hard Soda has less sugar: 0 g versus 4.7 g per 100 g.