Naturali vs Pelotazos futebolas
Overall, Naturali has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Naturali | Pelotazos futebolas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 449 kcal | 520 kcal |
| Fat | 13.5 g | 27.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.8 g | 4 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 6.5 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1.6 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 9.4 g | 5.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Naturali has 14% fewer calories (449 kcal vs 520 kcal).
- Naturali has 51% less fat (13.5 g vs 27.8 g).
- Naturali has 30% less saturated fat (2.8 g vs 4 g).
- Naturali has 62% less sugar (2.5 g vs 6.5 g).
- Naturali has 39% less salt (1 g vs 1.6 g).
- Naturali has 44% more fiber (2.5 g vs 1.4 g).
- Naturali has 43% more protein (9.4 g vs 5.4 g).
- Naturali is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Pelotazos futebolas lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Naturali
Царевичен грис, растително олио (слънчогледово олио), йодирана сол 1%,
Pelotazos futebolas
Semoule de mais (73%), huile de maïs, saveur fromage lactose (a partir de la poudre de lactosérum (a partir de lait), poudre de fromage (à partir de lait, préparations aromatisantes et substances aromatisantes, exhausteurs de gout (glutamate monosodique, inosinate disodique et guanylate disodique), chlorure de potassium, arôme de fumée] sucre, sel, colorants (concentré de légumes, extrait de paprika)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Naturali or Pelotazos futebolas?
Overall, Naturali has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Naturali has fewer calories: 449 kcal versus 520 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Naturali has less sugar: 2.5 g versus 6.5 g per 100 g.