Natural Casing Frankfurts vs Beef Franks
Overall, Beef Franks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Natural Casing Frankfurts | Beef Franks |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 286 kcal | 250 kcal |
| Fat | 26.8 g | 21.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 10.7 g | 8.9 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.8 g |
| Salt | 2.1 g | 2.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 12.5 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | Beef, Milk, Pork | Beef, Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Beef Franks has 12% fewer calories (250 kcal vs 286 kcal).
- Beef Franks has 20% less fat (21.4 g vs 26.8 g).
- Beef Franks has 17% less saturated fat (8.9 g vs 10.7 g).
- Natural Casing Frankfurts has no sugar, while Beef Franks has 1.8 g.
- Only Natural Casing Frankfurts lists: Milk, Pork.
- Only Beef Franks lists: Mustard.
Ingredients
Natural Casing Frankfurts
BEEF AND PORK, WATER, SALT, CONTAINS LESS THAN 2% OF:, NONFAT DRY MILK, CORN SYRUP, FLAVORING, DEXTROSE, SODIUM PHOSPHATE, ASCORBIC ACID (VITAMIN C), SODIUM NITRITE, OLEORESIN OF PAPRIKA, IN SHEEP CASING
Beef Franks
Beef, water, salt, sugar, dextrose, mustard, flavorings and colorings, garlic juice (garlic juice, salt), sodium erythorbate, sodium nitrite
FAQ
Which is healthier: Natural Casing Frankfurts or Beef Franks?
Overall, Beef Franks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Beef Franks has fewer calories: 250 kcal versus 286 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Natural Casing Frankfurts has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.