Beef Franks vs Quarter Pounder Franks
Overall, Beef Franks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Beef Franks | Quarter Pounder Franks |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 250 kcal | 286 kcal |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 24.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.9 g | 8 g |
| Sugars | 1.8 g | 2.7 g |
| Salt | 2.1 g | 2.6 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 12.5 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Beef, Mustard | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Beef Franks has 13% fewer calories (250 kcal vs 286 kcal).
- Beef Franks has 11% less fat (21.4 g vs 24.1 g).
- Beef Franks has 33% less sugar (1.8 g vs 2.7 g).
- Beef Franks has 19% less salt (2.1 g vs 2.6 g).
- Only Beef Franks lists: Beef, Mustard.
Ingredients
Beef Franks
Beef, water, salt, sugar, dextrose, mustard, flavorings and colorings, garlic juice (garlic juice, salt), sodium erythorbate, sodium nitrite
Quarter Pounder Franks
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Beef Franks or Quarter Pounder Franks?
Overall, Beef Franks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Beef Franks has fewer calories: 250 kcal versus 286 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Beef Franks has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 2.7 g per 100 g.