Nata Cremosa vs Nata Uht Montada Azucarada Sin Lactosa
Overall, Nata Uht Montada Azucarada Sin Lactosa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nata Cremosa
Nata Uht Montada Azucarada Sin Lactosa
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Nata Cremosa | Nata Uht Montada Azucarada S... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 336 kcal | 303 kcal |
| Fat | 35 g | 27 g |
| Saturated fat | 24 g | 18 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 13 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 2 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nata Uht Montada Azucarada Sin Lactosa has 23% less fat (27 g vs 35 g).
- Nata Uht Montada Azucarada Sin Lactosa has 25% less saturated fat (18 g vs 24 g).
- Nata Cremosa has 77% less sugar (3 g vs 13 g).
- Only Nata Cremosa lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Nata Cremosa
_Natas_ (M.G 35%), (Contém _Leite_) (Origem: Portugal), Emulsionante (E472B) e Estabilizador (E407).
Nata Uht Montada Azucarada Sin Lactosa
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Nata Cremosa or Nata Uht Montada Azucarada Sin Lactosa?
Overall, Nata Uht Montada Azucarada Sin Lactosa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nata Uht Montada Azucarada Sin Lactosa has fewer calories: 303 kcal versus 336 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nata Cremosa has less sugar: 3 g versus 13 g per 100 g.