Nata Cremosa vs Nata Culinária, -70% gordura*
Overall, Nata Culinária, -70% gordura* has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Nata Cremosa | Nata Culinária, -70% gordura... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 336 kcal | 128 kcal |
| Fat | 35 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 24 g | 7.2 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 4.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 2 g | 2.9 g |
| Additives | 2 | 4 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nata Culinária, -70% gordura* has 62% fewer calories (128 kcal vs 336 kcal).
- Nata Culinária, -70% gordura* has 71% less fat (10 g vs 35 g).
- Nata Culinária, -70% gordura* has 70% less saturated fat (7.2 g vs 24 g).
- Nata Cremosa has 32% less sugar (3 g vs 4.4 g).
- Nata Culinária, -70% gordura* has 31% more protein (2.9 g vs 2 g).
Ingredients
Nata Cremosa
_Nata_ (35%M.G.), emulsionante: E 472b e estabilizador: E 407.
Nata Culinária, -70% gordura*
_Nata_ (10% M.G.), amido modificado, emulsionantes: E 472b e E 471 e estabilizador: E 407.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Nata Cremosa or Nata Culinária, -70% gordura*?
Overall, Nata Culinária, -70% gordura* has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nata Culinária, -70% gordura* has fewer calories: 128 kcal versus 336 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nata Cremosa has less sugar: 3 g versus 4.4 g per 100 g.