Naked Bacon vs Bacón ahumado con madera de haya
Overall, Naked Bacon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Naked Bacon | Bacón ahumado con madera de... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 257 kcal | 289 kcal |
| Fat | 15.1 g | 25 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.5 g | 9 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 3 g | 2.4 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 29.4 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 1 | 7 |
| Allergens | Pork | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Naked Bacon has 11% fewer calories (257 kcal vs 289 kcal).
- Naked Bacon has 40% less fat (15.1 g vs 25 g).
- Naked Bacon has 39% less saturated fat (5.5 g vs 9 g).
- Bacón ahumado con madera de haya has 21% less salt (2.4 g vs 3 g).
- Naked Bacon has 49% more protein (29.4 g vs 15 g).
- Only Naked Bacon lists: Pork.
Ingredients
Naked Bacon
Pork (87%), Water, Salt, Natural Flavouring, Antioxidant: Ascorbic Acid
Bacón ahumado con madera de haya
panceta de cerdo 95%, sal, conservador E326, conservador E243, conservador E250, dextrosa, jarabe de glucosa, estabilizante E451, estabilizante E450, antioxidante E331, antioxidante E301, aromas, extracto de especias, Ahumado con madera de haya,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Naked Bacon or Bacón ahumado con madera de haya?
Overall, Naked Bacon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Naked Bacon has fewer calories: 257 kcal versus 289 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bacón ahumado con madera de haya has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 1 g per 100 g.