Comparison

Sucre Muscovado brun vs Alnatura Rohrohrzucker

Overall, Sucre Muscovado brun has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Better choice

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Sucre Muscovado brun	Alnatura Rohrohrzucker
Nutri-Score	e	e
NOVA group	2	2
Calories	377 kcal	388 kcal
Fat	0.1 g	0.5 g
Saturated fat	0.1 g	0.1 g
Sugars	93.2 g	97 g
Salt	0.3 g	0 g
Fiber	0.1 g	0.5 g
Protein	0.9 g	0.5 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Sucre Muscovado brun has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
Alnatura Rohrohrzucker has 80% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0.1 g).
Sucre Muscovado brun has 44% more protein (0.9 g vs 0.5 g).

Ingredients

Sucre Muscovado brun

Sucre muscovado

Alnatura Rohrohrzucker

Rohrohrzucker* *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sucre Muscovado brun or Alnatura Rohrohrzucker?

Overall, Sucre Muscovado brun has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sucre Muscovado brun has fewer calories: 377 kcal versus 388 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sucre Muscovado brun has less sugar: 93.2 g versus 97 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Sucre Muscovado brun vs Azucar mascavado Sucre Muscovado brun vs Rohrohr Zucker Sucre complet Muscovado vs Sucre Muscovado brun Sucre Muscovado brun vs Mascabado genuino Muscovado vs Sucre Muscovado brun Sucre Muscovado brun vs Zucchero integrale di ca... Alnatura Rohrohrzucker vs Azucar mascavado Rohrohr Zucker vs Alnatura Rohrohrzucker