Mummy Meegz M'z Gems Vegan vs Pastilhas de chocolate de leite
Overall, Pastilhas de chocolate de leite has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Mummy Meegz M'z Gems Vegan
Pastilhas de chocolate de leite
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mummy Meegz M'z Gems Vegan | Pastilhas de chocolate de le... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 470 kcal | 502 kcal |
| Fat | 24 g | 21 g |
| Saturated fat | 14 g | 12 g |
| Sugars | 59 g | 64 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 2.1 g | 5 g |
| Additives | 6 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pastilhas de chocolate de leite has 13% less fat (21 g vs 24 g).
- Pastilhas de chocolate de leite has 14% less saturated fat (12 g vs 14 g).
- Pastilhas de chocolate de leite has 100% more fiber (1 g vs 0 g).
- Pastilhas de chocolate de leite has 58% more protein (5 g vs 2.1 g).
- Only Mummy Meegz M'z Gems Vegan lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Mummy Meegz M'z Gems Vegan
Sugar, cocoa butter, dried rice syrup, cocoa mass, _almond_ paste, rice starch, concentrate (radish, carrot, spirulina), glazing agents (gum arabic, carnauba wax), emulsifier (sunflower lecithin), vanilla natural flavouring and colouring (riboflavin). May contain: Milk, Soy, Peanuts and other Tree Nuts.
Pastilhas de chocolate de leite
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mummy Meegz M'z Gems Vegan or Pastilhas de chocolate de leite?
Overall, Pastilhas de chocolate de leite has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mummy Meegz M'z Gems Vegan has fewer calories: 470 kcal versus 502 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mummy Meegz M'z Gems Vegan has less sugar: 59 g versus 64 g per 100 g.