Comparison

Multi-Déco vs Vermicelles à base de Haricot Mungo

Overall, Vermicelles à base de Haricot Mungo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMulti-DécoVermicelles à base de Harico...
Nutri-Score e b
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 410 kcal 347 kcal
Fat 3.8 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 2.5 g 0.1 g
Sugars 80 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0.9 g 5.5 g
Protein 1 g 0.5 g
Additives40
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Vermicelles à base de Haricot Mungo has 15% fewer calories (347 kcal vs 410 kcal).
  • Vermicelles à base de Haricot Mungo has 87% less fat (0.5 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Vermicelles à base de Haricot Mungo has 96% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Vermicelles à base de Haricot Mungo has 99% less sugar (0.5 g vs 80 g).
  • Vermicelles à base de Haricot Mungo has 84% more fiber (5.5 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Multi-Déco has 50% more protein (1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Vermicelles à base de Haricot Mungo has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Vermicelles à base de Haricot Mungo is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Multi-Déco

sucre, billes de céréales, beurre de cacao, shellac, rouge de betterave, carmins, complexes cuivriques de chlorophyllines, extrait de paprika, lutéine.

Vermicelles à base de Haricot Mungo

Amidon de haricot mungo 51 %, amidon de pois, eau.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Multi-Déco or Vermicelles à base de Haricot Mungo?

Overall, Vermicelles à base de Haricot Mungo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Vermicelles à base de Haricot Mungo has fewer calories: 347 kcal versus 410 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Vermicelles à base de Haricot Mungo has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 80 g per 100 g.

More comparisons