Comparison

Moule de cordes vs Moules de cordes bio

Overall, Moules de cordes bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMoule de cordesMoules de cordes bio
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group — —
Calories 57 kcal 50 kcal
Fat 0.9 g 1 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 0.6 g
Sugars 0.6 g 0 g
Salt 1.5 g 1.5 g
Protein 7.3 g 10 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Moules de cordes bio has 12% fewer calories (50 kcal vs 57 kcal).
  • Moules de cordes bio has no sugar, while Moule de cordes has 0.6 g.
  • Moules de cordes bio has 27% more protein (10 g vs 7.3 g).

Ingredients

Moule de cordes

Not available.

Moules de cordes bio

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Moule de cordes or Moules de cordes bio?

Overall, Moules de cordes bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Moules de cordes bio has fewer calories: 50 kcal versus 57 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Moules de cordes bio has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons