Mini Sticks White Chocolate Almond vs White chocolate almond
Overall, Mini Sticks White Chocolate Almond has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Mini Sticks White Chocolate Almond
White chocolate almond
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mini Sticks White Chocolate... | White chocolate almond |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 368 kcal | 463 kcal |
| Fat | 24.4 g | 28.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 15.9 g | 17.8 g |
| Sugars | 30.8 g | 39.7 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 4.9 g | 6.3 g |
| Additives | 5 | 7 |
| Allergens | Milk, Nuts | Milk, Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mini Sticks White Chocolate Almond has 21% fewer calories (368 kcal vs 463 kcal).
- Mini Sticks White Chocolate Almond has 15% less fat (24.4 g vs 28.8 g).
- Mini Sticks White Chocolate Almond has 11% less saturated fat (15.9 g vs 17.8 g).
- Mini Sticks White Chocolate Almond has 22% less sugar (30.8 g vs 39.7 g).
- White chocolate almond has 22% more protein (6.3 g vs 4.9 g).
Ingredients
Mini Sticks White Chocolate Almond
reconstituted skimmed milk, sugar, cocoa butter, liquid whey concentrate (milk), coconut fat, glucose-fructose syrup, chopped almonds, butter cil (milk), dextrose, emulsifiers: sunflower lecithins, mono - and diglycerides of fatty acids, polyglycerol polyricinoleate, stabilisers: locust bean gum, guar gum, carrot concentrate, bourbon vanilla extract, ground extracted bourbon vanilla pods, allergy advice: for allergens, see ingredients in bold, may also contain other nuts, peanuts and soya, storage instructions: keep frozen, if thawed, do not refreeze, at-18°c best before end: see side of pack, additional information: suitable for vegetarians, multipack not to be sold separately, although every care has been taken to remove shells, some small pieces may remain, caution: small children can choke on nuts , disposal: carton - widely recycledb wraps - not yet recycled, metmælk fra eu, cuklaakuorrutetta ja 5 % keri, kaakaovoi, heratiiviste mantelirouhe, vasyahappojenmono ja stabilpintlaineet ourbonvanitjauute, jauhettu ja saltää pieniä määriä soijaa, nutta tuotetta ei saa jäädyttää co sivu, valmistettu saksassa, voirasva, by buying utz certified cocoa, lidl supports sustainable cocoa farming, utz certified farmers implement better farming practices, with respect for people and planet, www,lidl-info,com/utz med 34 % vit choklad och 5 % utz certified t, vasslekoncentrat (av mjölk), centrerat smör, druvsocker, сосоа avintoarvo/ n information nettovægt:/nettopaino:/nettovikt:/net weight: 12x38g% ,d456 g %3d %ri 9 /50 ml (38 g)** coc 11(140 koal 7%
White chocolate almond
LAIT écrémé réhydraté, sucre, beurre de cacao, eau, AMANDES, huile de coco, LAIT en poudre entier, sirop de glucose, sirop de glucose-fructose, BEURRE concentré, LACTOSE et protéines de LAIT, LAIT en poudre écrémé, émulsifiants (E442, E476, E471), gousses de vanille épuisées broyées, stabilisants (E407, E410, E412), arôme naturel de vanille' (dont LAIT), arôme, colorant (E160a).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mini Sticks White Chocolate Almond or White chocolate almond?
Overall, Mini Sticks White Chocolate Almond has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mini Sticks White Chocolate Almond has fewer calories: 368 kcal versus 463 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mini Sticks White Chocolate Almond has less sugar: 30.8 g versus 39.7 g per 100 g.