Mini Sticks White Chocolate Almond vs White chocolate almond
Overall, White chocolate almond has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Mini Sticks White Chocolate Almond
White chocolate almond
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mini Sticks White Chocolate... | White chocolate almond |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 368 kcal | 342 kcal |
| Fat | 24.4 g | 21.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 15.9 g | 13.3 g |
| Sugars | 30.8 g | 29.1 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | — |
| Protein | 4.9 g | 5.1 g |
| Additives | 5 | 5 |
| Allergens | Milk, Nuts | Milk, Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- White chocolate almond has 11% less fat (21.7 g vs 24.4 g).
- White chocolate almond has 16% less saturated fat (13.3 g vs 15.9 g).
Ingredients
Mini Sticks White Chocolate Almond
reconstituted skimmed milk, sugar, cocoa butter, liquid whey concentrate (milk), coconut fat, glucose-fructose syrup, chopped almonds, butter cil (milk), dextrose, emulsifiers: sunflower lecithins, mono - and diglycerides of fatty acids, polyglycerol polyricinoleate, stabilisers: locust bean gum, guar gum, carrot concentrate, bourbon vanilla extract, ground extracted bourbon vanilla pods, allergy advice: for allergens, see ingredients in bold, may also contain other nuts, peanuts and soya, storage instructions: keep frozen, if thawed, do not refreeze, at-18°c best before end: see side of pack, additional information: suitable for vegetarians, multipack not to be sold separately, although every care has been taken to remove shells, some small pieces may remain, caution: small children can choke on nuts , disposal: carton - widely recycledb wraps - not yet recycled, metmælk fra eu, cuklaakuorrutetta ja 5 % keri, kaakaovoi, heratiiviste mantelirouhe, vasyahappojenmono ja stabilpintlaineet ourbonvanitjauute, jauhettu ja saltää pieniä määriä soijaa, nutta tuotetta ei saa jäädyttää co sivu, valmistettu saksassa, voirasva, by buying utz certified cocoa, lidl supports sustainable cocoa farming, utz certified farmers implement better farming practices, with respect for people and planet, www,lidl-info,com/utz med 34 % vit choklad och 5 % utz certified t, vasslekoncentrat (av mjölk), centrerat smör, druvsocker, сосоа avintoarvo/ n information nettovægt:/nettopaino:/nettovikt:/net weight: 12x38g% ,d456 g %3d %ri 9 /50 ml (38 g)** coc 11(140 koal 7%
White chocolate almond
Lait écrémé, sucre, beurre de cacao, concentré de lactosérum liquide (lait), graisse de coco, 6% éclats d'amande, lait en poudre entier, sirop de glucose, lait en poudre écrémé, sirop de glucose-fructose, beurre concentré (lait), émulsifiants: mono - et diglycérides d'acides gras*, lecithines (tournesol), polyricinoléate de polyglycérol; stabilisants: farine de graines de caroube, gomme guar; concentré de carotte à propriété colorante, arôme naturel de vanille Bourbon, 0,03% gousses de vanille épuisées moulues, arôme. Chocolat blanc: beurre de cacao: 30 % minimum; matière sèche issue du lait: 23% minimum. *d'origine végétale.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mini Sticks White Chocolate Almond or White chocolate almond?
Overall, White chocolate almond has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
White chocolate almond has fewer calories: 342 kcal versus 368 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
White chocolate almond has less sugar: 29.1 g versus 30.8 g per 100 g.