Comparison

Mini Sticks White Chocolate Almond vs Batonnet Chocolat Blanc Amande

Overall, Batonnet Chocolat Blanc Amande has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMini Sticks White Chocolate...Batonnet Chocolat Blanc Aman...
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 368 kcal 247 kcal
Fat 24.4 g 15 g
Saturated fat 15.9 g 9.3 g
Sugars 30.8 g 21 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0.7 g —
Protein 4.9 g 3.3 g
Additives57
AllergensMilk, NutsMilk, Nuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Batonnet Chocolat Blanc Amande has 33% fewer calories (247 kcal vs 368 kcal).
  • Batonnet Chocolat Blanc Amande has 39% less fat (15 g vs 24.4 g).
  • Batonnet Chocolat Blanc Amande has 42% less saturated fat (9.3 g vs 15.9 g).
  • Batonnet Chocolat Blanc Amande has 32% less sugar (21 g vs 30.8 g).
  • Mini Sticks White Chocolate Almond has 33% more protein (4.9 g vs 3.3 g).
  • Batonnet Chocolat Blanc Amande has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Mini Sticks White Chocolate Almond

reconstituted skimmed milk, sugar, cocoa butter, liquid whey concentrate (milk), coconut fat, glucose-fructose syrup, chopped almonds, butter cil (milk), dextrose, emulsifiers: sunflower lecithins, mono - and diglycerides of fatty acids, polyglycerol polyricinoleate, stabilisers: locust bean gum, guar gum, carrot concentrate, bourbon vanilla extract, ground extracted bourbon vanilla pods, allergy advice: for allergens, see ingredients in bold, may also contain other nuts, peanuts and soya, storage instructions: keep frozen, if thawed, do not refreeze, at-18°c best before end: see side of pack, additional information: suitable for vegetarians, multipack not to be sold separately, although every care has been taken to remove shells, some small pieces may remain, caution: small children can choke on nuts , disposal: carton - widely recycledb wraps - not yet recycled, metmælk fra eu, cuklaakuorrutetta ja 5 % keri, kaakaovoi, heratiiviste mantelirouhe, vasyahappojenmono ja stabilpintlaineet ourbonvanitjauute, jauhettu ja saltää pieniä määriä soijaa, nutta tuotetta ei saa jäädyttää co sivu, valmistettu saksassa, voirasva, by buying utz certified cocoa, lidl supports sustainable cocoa farming, utz certified farmers implement better farming practices, with respect for people and planet, www,lidl-info,com/utz med 34 % vit choklad och 5 % utz certified t, vasslekoncentrat (av mjölk), centrerat smör, druvsocker, сосоа avintoarvo/ n information nettovægt:/nettopaino:/nettovikt:/net weight: 12x38g% ,d456 g %3d %ri 9 /50 ml (38 g)** coc 11(140 koal 7%

Batonnet Chocolat Blanc Amande

LAIT écrémé réhydraté, sucre, beurre de cacao¹, eau, AMANDES, huile de coco, LAIT en poudre entier, sirop de glucose, sirop de glucose-fructose, BEURRE concentré, LACTOSE et protéines de LAIT, LAIT en poudre écrémé, émulsifiants (E442, E476, E471), gousses de vanille épuisées broyées, stabilisants (E407, E410, E412), arôme naturel de vanille¹ (dont LAIT), arôme, colorant (E160a). Peut contenir: soja, autres fruits à coque. Sans gluten. ¹Vérifié Rainforest Alliance™.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mini Sticks White Chocolate Almond or Batonnet Chocolat Blanc Amande?

Overall, Batonnet Chocolat Blanc Amande has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Batonnet Chocolat Blanc Amande has fewer calories: 247 kcal versus 368 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Batonnet Chocolat Blanc Amande has less sugar: 21 g versus 30.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons