Mini saucissons aux noix vs Saucisson sec aux noix
Overall, Saucisson sec aux noix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Mini saucissons aux noix
Saucisson sec aux noix
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mini saucissons aux noix | Saucisson sec aux noix |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 538 kcal | 319 kcal |
| Fat | 46 g | 22.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 18 g | 7.8 g |
| Sugars | 3.1 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 4.2 g | 3.6 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 27 g | 26 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk, Nuts | Milk, Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Saucisson sec aux noix has 41% fewer calories (319 kcal vs 538 kcal).
- Saucisson sec aux noix has 52% less fat (22.3 g vs 46 g).
- Saucisson sec aux noix has 57% less saturated fat (7.8 g vs 18 g).
- Saucisson sec aux noix has 14% less salt (3.6 g vs 4.2 g).
Ingredients
Mini saucissons aux noix
Viande de porc (origine UE), _noix_ 15%, sel, _lactose_, dextrose, épices et plantes aromatiques, conservateurs : nitrite de sodium , ferments, Enveloppe : collagène, Traces éventuelles d'autres fruits à coque et de lait.
Saucisson sec aux noix
Maigre de porc (origine UE) ; gras de porc (origine UE) ; noix (5,8%) ; lactose ; sel ; dextrose ; épices ; saccharose ; conservateur : nitrate de potassium ; ferments lactiques. 145 g de viande mis en ?uvre pour 1 oog de produit fini.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mini saucissons aux noix or Saucisson sec aux noix?
Overall, Saucisson sec aux noix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Saucisson sec aux noix has fewer calories: 319 kcal versus 538 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Saucisson sec aux noix has less sugar: 3 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.