Mini Pipe Rigate vs Girandole 34
Overall, Girandole 34 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mini Pipe Rigate | Girandole 34 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 359 kcal | 359 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 3.5 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Ingredients
Mini Pipe Rigate
durum wheat semolina, water, may contain traces of soy,
Girandole 34
Semoule de BLÉ dur, eau. Peut contenir des traces de SOJA et de MOUTARDE.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mini Pipe Rigate or Girandole 34?
Overall, Girandole 34 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mini Pipe Rigate has fewer calories: 359 kcal versus 359 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mini Pipe Rigate has less sugar: 3.5 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.