Comparison

Miel de fleurs - Bloemenhoning vs Pate a tartiner, noir

Overall, Miel de fleurs - Bloemenhoning has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMiel de fleurs - Bloemenhoni...Pate a tartiner, noir
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 2 4
Calories 320 kcal 562 kcal
Fat 0.1 g 37 g
Saturated fat 0 g 11 g
Sugars 79.3 g 49 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g 5.1 g
Protein 0.5 g 3.7 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedMilk, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Miel de fleurs - Bloemenhoning has 43% fewer calories (320 kcal vs 562 kcal).
  • Miel de fleurs - Bloemenhoning has 100% less fat (0.1 g vs 37 g).
  • Miel de fleurs - Bloemenhoning has no saturated fat, while Pate a tartiner, noir has 11 g.
  • Pate a tartiner, noir has 38% less sugar (49 g vs 79.3 g).
  • Pate a tartiner, noir has 100% more fiber (5.1 g vs 0 g).
  • Pate a tartiner, noir has 86% more protein (3.7 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Miel de fleurs - Bloemenhoning is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Pate a tartiner, noir lists: Milk, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Miel de fleurs - Bloemenhoning

Miel de fleurs

Pate a tartiner, noir

sugar, vegetable oils (colza, palm, palm), cocoa powder heavily fattened (16%), emulsifier (soy lecithin), aroma, skimmed milk powder,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Miel de fleurs - Bloemenhoning or Pate a tartiner, noir?

Overall, Miel de fleurs - Bloemenhoning has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Miel de fleurs - Bloemenhoning has fewer calories: 320 kcal versus 562 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pate a tartiner, noir has less sugar: 49 g versus 79.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons