Comparison

Melton Mowbray Pork Pies vs Melton Mowbray Pork Pie

Overall, Melton Mowbray Pork Pies has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMelton Mowbray Pork PiesMelton Mowbray Pork Pie
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 360 kcal 410 kcal
Fat 23.6 g 28.6 g
Saturated fat 8.8 g 10.5 g
Sugars 1.4 g 1.6 g
Salt 0.9 g 0.9 g
Fiber 0.2 g 1.3 g
Protein 10.2 g 9.3 g
Additives11
AllergensEggs, Gluten, PorkEggs, Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Melton Mowbray Pork Pies has 12% fewer calories (360 kcal vs 410 kcal).
  • Melton Mowbray Pork Pies has 17% less fat (23.6 g vs 28.6 g).
  • Melton Mowbray Pork Pies has 16% less saturated fat (8.8 g vs 10.5 g).
  • Melton Mowbray Pork Pie has 85% more fiber (1.3 g vs 0.2 g).
  • Melton Mowbray Pork Pies has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Melton Mowbray Pork Pies lists: Pork.

Ingredients

Melton Mowbray Pork Pies

Wheat Flour [Wheat Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin], Pork (31%), Pork Lard, Water, Pork Fat, Potato Starch, Palm Oil, Rapeseed Oil, Salt, Pasteurised Egg, Pork Gelatine, White Pepper.

Melton Mowbray Pork Pie

Fortified Wheat Flour (Wheat Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin), British Pork (31%), Pork Lard, Water, Potato Starch, Palm Oil, Rapeseed Oil, Salt, Pasteurised Egg, Pork gelatine, White Pepper, Pork Fat, Black Pepper.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Melton Mowbray Pork Pies or Melton Mowbray Pork Pie?

Overall, Melton Mowbray Pork Pies has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Melton Mowbray Pork Pies has fewer calories: 360 kcal versus 410 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Melton Mowbray Pork Pies has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons