Comparison

Melton Mowbray Pork Pie vs Melton Mowbray pork pie

Overall, Melton Mowbray Pork Pie has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMelton Mowbray Pork PieMelton Mowbray pork pie
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 347 kcal 412 kcal
Fat 21.8 g 30 g
Saturated fat 8 g 10.9 g
Sugars 1.6 g 1.2 g
Salt 1.1 g 1 g
Fiber 1.5 g 1 g
Protein 10.9 g 10.2 g
Additives11
AllergensEggs, Gluten, PorkEggs, Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Melton Mowbray Pork Pie has 16% fewer calories (347 kcal vs 412 kcal).
  • Melton Mowbray Pork Pie has 27% less fat (21.8 g vs 30 g).
  • Melton Mowbray Pork Pie has 27% less saturated fat (8 g vs 10.9 g).
  • Melton Mowbray pork pie has 25% less sugar (1.2 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Melton Mowbray Pork Pie has 33% more fiber (1.5 g vs 1 g).
  • Melton Mowbray Pork Pie has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Melton Mowbray Pork Pie lists: Pork.

Ingredients

Melton Mowbray Pork Pie

Wheat Flour [Wheat Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin], Pork (30%), Pork Lard, Water, Palm Oil, Rapeseed Oil, Salt, Pasteurised Egg, Pork Gelatine, White Pepper.

Melton Mowbray pork pie

39% british pork, wheat flour (wheat flour, calcium carbonate, iron, niacin, thiamin), water, pork lard, potato starch, palm oil, rapeseed oil, salt, pork gelatine, egg, ground black pepper, ground white pepper, pork fat.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Melton Mowbray Pork Pie or Melton Mowbray pork pie?

Overall, Melton Mowbray Pork Pie has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Melton Mowbray Pork Pie has fewer calories: 347 kcal versus 412 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Melton Mowbray pork pie has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons