Mayonnaise recette originale vs Tomato ketchup
Overall, Tomato ketchup has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mayonnaise recette originale | Tomato ketchup |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 592 kcal | 102 kcal |
| Fat | 65.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.8 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 22.8 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 1.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 1.2 g |
| Additives | 5 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Mustard, Soybeans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Celery |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tomato ketchup has 83% fewer calories (102 kcal vs 592 kcal).
- Tomato ketchup has 100% less fat (0.1 g vs 65.2 g).
- Tomato ketchup has 99% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 9.8 g).
- Mayonnaise recette originale has 100% less sugar (0.1 g vs 22.8 g).
- Tomato ketchup is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Mayonnaise recette originale lists: Eggs, Mustard, Soybeans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
- Only Tomato ketchup lists: Celery.
Ingredients
Mayonnaise recette originale
Huile de soja, eau, vinaigre de table, jaune d’œufs, moutarde", sel, stabilisants (E412, E415), conservateur : (E202, E211) et antioxydant : E330. * contient des sulfites
Tomato ketchup
Pomodori (148 g per 100 g Tomato Ketchup), aceto di alcool, zucchero, sale, estratti di spezie ed erbe aromatiche (contiene sedano), spezie.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mayonnaise recette originale or Tomato ketchup?
Overall, Tomato ketchup has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tomato ketchup has fewer calories: 102 kcal versus 592 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mayonnaise recette originale has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 22.8 g per 100 g.