Comparison

Marcassou Marcachouffe zonder look bel vs Achterham

Overall, Achterham has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMarcassou Marcachouffe zonde...Achterham
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 442 kcal 102 kcal
Fat 36 g 2.1 g
Saturated fat 14 g 0.8 g
Sugars 3.5 g 0.6 g
Salt 3.9 g 2.3 g
Fiber — 0.1 g
Protein 26 g 16 g
Additives28
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Achterham has 77% fewer calories (102 kcal vs 442 kcal).
  • Achterham has 94% less fat (2.1 g vs 36 g).
  • Achterham has 94% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 14 g).
  • Achterham has 83% less sugar (0.6 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Achterham has 42% less salt (2.3 g vs 3.9 g).
  • Marcassou Marcachouffe zonder look bel has 38% more protein (26 g vs 16 g).
  • Achterham has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Marcassou Marcachouffe zonder look bel

pork meat, salt, maltodextrin, dextrose, spices, aromatic plants, dye: natural mealybug, antioxidant: sodium ascorbate, preservative: sodium nitrite, ferments, smoke,

Achterham

78% VARKENSVLEES, WATER, ZUURTEREGELAAR (KALIUMACETATEN [E261], KALIUMLACTAAT [E326]), ZOUT, NATUURLIJKE AROMA'S, AARDAPPELZETMEEL, GLUCOSESTROOP, AROMA, DEXTROSE, STABILISATOR (CARRAGEEN [E407], DIFOSFATEN [E450], TRIFOSFATEN (E451), POLYFOSFATEN [E452]), GISTEXTRACT, ANTIOXIDANT (NATRIUMASCORBAAT [E301]), CONSERVEERMIDDEL (NATRIUMNITRIET (E250]), ROOK.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Marcassou Marcachouffe zonder look bel or Achterham?

Overall, Achterham has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Achterham has fewer calories: 102 kcal versus 442 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Achterham has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons